Poor Readers Have Gotten Worse, U.S. Study Shows.  Education Now  Depends Even More On TV
 

I am including this important news article as a prelude to writing about how the growing illiteracy in this country leads to an over-dependence on the visual media for so-called education -- so that now Television becomes the predominant educational technology in the US.

Just look at any survey of the number of hours children spend in front of TV compared with the number of hours in class, or in doing homework.

Television "education" in the field of health is particularly loaded with false information, much of it in the form of paid-for advertising by drug companies, pushing drugs which, just a few decades ago, would have been illegal, or at least not allowed, to be promoted on public media.

So, we have drug companies controlling much of the educational process in the US just now -- using technology of brain washing far superior to any study technology in use within the school system.

The health of our country is declining exactly because literacy is declining, particularly in youth. These youth are growing up with an educational culture that stress visual, stresses TV, and is intensively filled with drugs as being the accepted handling of health problems.

The educational problems in our country may well be caused, deliberately, by those who want to keep the population subservient and under control.

It is chilling to consider that all this wailing about "poor schools" and poor educational technology may be held in place, deliberately, by those beholden to the drug interests.

Don't ever lose sight of the fact that drugs are a tool to control, and the ones who are doing the controlling are governments -- allowing the drug companies to gain massive profits while doing exactly what the government wants done -- drive the society into the state of unresisting vegetables.

Poor Readers Have Gotten Worse, U.S. Study Shows
Education: Reforms since 1992 have failed to raise scores, except among high-achieving pupils.

By DUKE HELFAND and MARTHA GROVES, Times Education Writers
 

     Test scores of the nation's weakest elementary school readers declined sharply over the last eight years even as the strongest readers showed solid gains, according to data released Friday by the U.S. Department of Education.

Students Who Spend Much Time With TV Will NOT Be Literate!

     The widening gap between the best and worst fourth-grade readers underscored the failure of a multibillion-dollar government investment to raise the woeful performance of the nation's lowest achievers, federal education officials said.
     Moreover, the National Assessment of Educational Progress report showed that fourth-grade reading skills overall have not budged since 1992, despite massive school reform efforts in California and elsewhere.
     Educators and government officials expressed chagrin over the disappointing results, known as the "nation's report card."
     "After spending $125 billion . . . over 25 years, we have virtually nothing to show for it," said U.S. Education Secretary Rod Paige, referring to the federal government's leading school program for poor children known as Title I. "Fewer than a third of fourth-graders can read at grade level."
     Other educators said the gap between high and low achievers suggests that the nation is failing children who need the most help.
     "It is a frightening sort of educational Darwinism," said Kati Haycock, director of the Education Trust, a Washington nonprofit organization that monitors achievement trends.
     Leading educators said the results were particularly distressing given that researchers in recent years have reached a consensus on how students learn to read and how best to teach the skill.
     Numerous government-sponsored studies over the last decade have found that explicit instruction in sound-letter relationships and phonics practice, combined with exposure to rich literature, produce the best results.
     That approach, however, has yet to find its way into many classrooms as teachers and those who train them continue to embrace unproven methods and programs.
     "There's a cultural barrier that we need to overcome. It's an enormous problem all over the country," said Christopher T. Cross, president of the Council for Basic Education, a nonprofit organization in Washington that advocates education reforms.
     "We're very bad in education about getting research into the hands of practitioners."
     President Bush has offered a plan to invest huge sums in phonics instruction and test students annually beginning in the third grade.
     The Bush administration's proposed Reading First initiative, contained in the budget that the President will put forward Monday, embraces the research-based approach to reading instruction.
     It calls for spending $5 billion over five years to teach early reading skills in the nation's Head Start program and to train elementary school teachers in research-based instruction methods, with the goal of ensuring that all students read by third grade.
     Friday's report is the latest in a succession of government studies designed to track the reading skills of the nation's fourth-graders.
     For this round, 8,000 students from public and private schools in about 40 states were tested nationwide last year. Fourth-graders also took comparable exams in 1992, 1994 and 1998. In each case, students had to complete multiple-choice questions and write short answers and short essays. The scores are broken out by sex, race, region and income level.
     Among the key findings:
     * Overall, 32% of fourth-graders were deemed to be "proficient" or better in reading in 2000, a small but significant increase over 1992 results. "Proficient" indicates that students have an overall understanding of the texts they are reading.
     Still, nearly four in 10 students nationally continue to read below a basic level, meaning they have serious problems understanding even simple texts, according to the analysis.
     * The nation's top-performing fourth-graders--those at the 75th and 90th percentiles--made significant progress between 1992 and 2000. At the same time, the scores of the lowest performers--those at the 10th percentile--dropped during the period.
     Haycock of the Education Trust said the results suggest that schools are focusing their efforts on students most likely to succeed, while neglecting all others.
     * White and Asian/Pacific Islander students continued to outpace all other ethnic groups, affirming the vast gulf that has long existed between the groups. African Americans were the lowest performers.
     * The Asian/Pacific Islander group showed phenomenal gains from 1992, whereas African Americans, Latinos, whites and Native Americans all held their own or lost ground. Not only did Asian/Pacific Islanders have the highest raw scores, but greater percentages of them also were deemed proficient.
     * Sixty-three percent of African American fourth-graders, 60% of children in poverty and 47% of children in urban schools fell "below basic" in their skills, meaning they have less than even a "partial mastery" of the material.
     * Suburban students outperformed those in cities and rural areas. And girls did better than boys once again, though neither group showed significant gains since 1992.
     * Students who reported reading more either in school and for school work or for fun at home scored higher than students who read less.
     One top literacy expert said it would be naive to have expected significant reading progress since 1992, given the freshness of the revolution in teaching methods.
     "We have to figure out how to translate research into something people can use in classrooms," said Catherine Snow, a Harvard professor who chaired a panel that produced a report three years ago called "Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children."
     "That means massive investment in professional development," Snow said. "It's a serious and long-term undertaking."

Copyright 2001 Los Angeles Times

If you missed it, you can go to either a SHORT explanation of the whole story, or a detailed explanation on ONE PAGE.  On this page you are getting more detail on one part of the story, but on either of those pages you can get the broad picture.  Don't miss reading one of them.  You can actually spend many hours on this web site, depending on the depth of research and reading you want to do.  There are an amazing 4,000 pages here -- more information on these general subjects than almost all other web sites combined!  At some point along the way you will probably say, "Karl's crazy," and leave never to return to this site, or you will say "I want to try some of that oral chelation formula he writes about!"

SUBSCRIBE:  The Wednesday Letter is a free electronic monthly newsletter written and published by Karl Loren.  You can view more than 50 back issues of this publication by clicking here.  The Wednesday Letter subscription list is maintained on a secure server, no name is ever given or sold to anyone, and it is never used except for this Newsletter.  It is automatically published on the Tuesday night just before the first Wednesday of every month.  You can subscribe to this free monthly electronic letter by entering your eMail address and name below.  You will then automatically receive a request for confirmation, sent to whatever address you have entered.  If you do NOT receive this confirmation request, then you will not be subscribed.  There may have been an error with your address and you should resubmit.  The letter is never sent twice to the same address -- so you do not have to worry about a duplicate subscription.  When you receive this confirmation request you must reply to it, or your subscription will not become active.  No one can subscribe your name, and address, without you being notified, and if you get an unwanted notice of subscription you only need to DO NOTHING and the subscription will NOT be active.

REMOVAL:  You can remove yourself from the subscription list in several different ways.  Click here to read about this entire newsletter system.  Every edition of The Wednesday Letter is delivered to your address with YOUR name and address in view on the letter, with a link that allows you to remove THAT name from the subscription list.  If you try to send this removal message from an address different from the one you used to send in your original confirmation, then you will get a warning notice first, sent to the subscription address, asking you to confirm that you want to be removed from the list -- by replying to THAT request for confirmation, you will then be automatically removed.  Thus, no one else can unsubscribe you, from some other computer, without your knowledge.  But, if you send in the unsubscribe notice from the same machine used to receive the Letter, then the removal from the subscription list is automatic.

Personal Message:  When you send a personal message to Karl Loren, you will receive a personal reply as per his instructions.  Karl pledges that every personal message will get a personal answer. When you provide your mail address, we will send you free information including our free catalog and a cassette tape lecture by Karl Loren about heart disease, no charge, by mail, even if outside the US.  You can select particular information you would like to receive, along with the free cassette tape and catalog.

You can reach Vibrant Life in many ways, including by mail to Vibrant Life, 2808 N. Naomi St., Burbank, CA 91504.  Within the US and Canada, use the toll free number:  (800) 523-4521, the local number:  (818) 558-1799, the FAX:  (818) 558-7299, eMail to kimberly@oralchelation.com or any one of the hundreds of message forms throughout the 50 web sites.  Vibrant Life normally ships the same day we get an order.  There are message forms on each of the 100,000+ pages on this and other sites where you can communicate with Vibrant Life.  Check out our companion site, at:  http://www.oralchelation.net where Karl's 2000 page book is published.  Karl Loren is the author and webmaster for this BOOK, as well as for another web site about ORAL CHELATION.  His personal philosophical articles are at PHILOSOPHY. 

Copyright © May 20, 2008 6:25 AM by Karl Loren on behalf of Vibrant Life, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.  Permission is granted for non-commercial downloading, copying, distribution or redistribution on two conditions:  One, that some form of copyright notice is included in every copy distributed or copied, showing the copyright belonging to Vibrant Life, Burbank, CA, at www.oralchelation.com . The second condition is that the material is not to be used for any purpose contrary to the purposes and objectives of this site.  This permission does not extend to materials on this site which are copyrighted by others.