Prominent Doctor Ward Dean Comments About Oral Chelation

Dr. Dean has loaned out this story to others who sell suspect products, including two whose web addresses are below, where some product is being sold. Either of these web sites will serve as a "source" for this article, originally published elsewhere.

These other pages include Ward Dean's material without the inserted disagreements that I have included.

This is a very incomplete formula. Dr. Gary Gordon take 6 grams of EDTA per day, as does Karl Loren. While this is a high dosage, 100 mg is an insignificant dosage and I would call this formula worthless as an oral chelation formula. But, they are still fond of using the Ward Dean article. When I quote it, as below, I insert my agreements and disagreements.

http://www.kirlian.org/life_enhancement_products/deanchelation.html Note this is an almost missing web page -- with error messages when you click on various links. This is very common in this world of "oral chelation." Vibrant Life was the first on the web with oral chelation, and now has over 95,000 pages of published material -- many have tried to copy some of Vibrant Life's ideas and have gone out of business, just as this one apparently has.

Interestingly enough, Ward Dean is NOT found on Dr. Gordon's current web sites.

Dr. Dean is, as far as I know, currently working full time as a medical vitamin consultant for "Vitamin Research Products." Many years ago, before Dr. Dean was associated with VRP, Vibrant Life actually had some of its products manufactured by VPR, and I spent many hours with their research department, giving them information about oral chelation which they, at that time, admitted they had no data on. VRP is a reputable manufacturer, very large, but suffers from the usual problem of many very large vitamin companies, they feel that they cannot afford to make anything very unusual, or "leading edge."

comments on
Oral Chelation
My own clinical experience with oral chelation (using EDTA) supports that of Dr. Gordon's. I am also in agreement with his rough calculations regarding the absorption and equivalence of oral to intravenous chelation (i.e., one month's consumption of an effective oral-chelation product produces approximately the same effect as one intravenous chelation). These calculations are similar to those that I have previously proposed.

[Karl: The intravenous doctors are fighting a losing battle with the claim that ONE treatment of intravenous chelation is worth 30 days' worth of oral chelation. Many people who take oral chelation get results that are as dramatic as those who take the intravenous route -- and get those results within a few days.

There is no science to this question -- just observation by individual practitioners.

To the guy with an intravenous needle, the oral approach used to be called a fraud. They cannot argue that any more, so now they say that it is one thirtieth of the value of one I/V treatment. The fact that one month of oral can cost less than $100 while ONE I/V treatment is about $100 does NOT get mentioned either.

Dr. Ward Dean is not a particularly useful source of data about "oral chelation" since he has endorsed some fraudulent products. When I find my records about it, I believe he also endorsed Athechell, one of the biggest frauds on the web.

Nevertheless, I believe that the oral form of treatment does not completely replace all the benefits of the intravenous mode, nor are its effects so rapidly apparent. I recommend oral chelation for its preventive role, as well as for supplementation and maintenance for those receiving intravenous chelation.

However, I don't think Dr. Gordon's explanation that oral chelation works only as an anticoagulant is the whole story. I, too, have seen and heard of dramatic clinical improvements in very debilitated patients who had used only oral chelation as a treatment. I doubt whether such reversals of what were considered irreversible conditions (atherosclerosis, dementia, diabetes, hypertension) would be due only to EDTA's anticoagulant effect. I believe oral EDTA also positively influences mineral metabolism (similar to the effect of intravenous chelation), and it may have other effects as well. I'm not sure whether we really know exactly what all of the mechanisms (and/or benefits for that matter) of EDTA chelation are. For example, Dr. Gordon presents a very eloquent and well-documented case for the mineral-normalizing hypothesis of EDTA treatment in his landmark book, The Chelation Answer.¹

However, in the other popular "bible" of chelation, Bypassing Bypass², Dr. Elmer Cranton dismisses the "calcium-chelation misconception." He believes that removal of toxic heavy metals and normalization of mineral metabolism are secondary mechanisms, and he proposes that the benefits of chelation are due primarily to its free-radical fighting effects. Dr. Johan Bjorksten, father of the "cross-linkage theory of aging," believes that the benefits of EDTA are due to its ability to dissolve inter- and intramolecular cross-linkages.³

[Karl: My hero, early in my career of "oral chelation" was Dr. Elmer Cranton. I agree with HIM that it is the free radical that causes heart disease. What Dr. Dean is missing here is that it is the toxic metals that greatly increase the activity of free radicals. Unfortunately, Dr. Cranton has been too closely involved with the needle people and continues to claim that oral EDTA is useless.

Mechanisms aside, the one issue we all agree on is the overwhelming safety of EDTA when administered in proper dosages (patients with kidney impairment need to be closely monitored, as they do with many medications). It is also well-accepted that the tremendous benefits of EDTA can be obtained in a variety of degenerative, age-related conditions.

[Karl: Ward is wrong here about the need of "closely monitoring" patients who receive EDTA orally. When EDTA is taken intravenously 100% of it gets into the blood stream. It is an artificial substance, so the body gets rid of it through the kidneys. If the kidneys are weak, the patient has a problem.

What Ward is deliberately missing here is that when EDTA is taken ORALLY only about 5% of it gets into the blood stream -- so there is very little burden on the kidneys. He also ignores Dr. Gordon's data that "oral EDTA" works its wonders from inside the intestine. The 5% of the EDTA that gets absorbed orally is useful, but the great bulk of the benefit of oral EDTA is from that which DOES NOT get absorbed into the blood stream.

When EDTA is working from inside the intestine it attracts metals from wherever they may be in the body, through the intestinal wall, into the stool, and this is all expelled into the toilet. This action has nothing to do with the kidneys.

Finally, no better testimonial for the benefits of EDTA therapy's preventive and antiaging effects is Dr. Gordon, himself. Threatened with coronary artery disease in his late 30s, and a candidate for coronary bypass, Dr. Gordon took his own medicine, became a member of the "Century Club" (over 100 intravenous chelations), consumes his own oral EDTA formulation daily, and today, in his 60s, could easily pass for a man 20 years younger.

1. Walker M, Gordon G. The Chelation Answer. M. Evans and Company: New York;1982.

2. Cranton E. Bypassing Bypass (2d Ed). Medex Publishers.Trout Dale, VA 24378-0044;1992.

3. Bjorksten, Johan. The cross-linkage theory of aging as a predictive indicator. In: A Textbook on EDTA Chelation Therapy, Cranton E (ed). American College of Advancement in Medicine, Laguna Niguel, CA;1989.

Chelation is a chemical process by which a metal or mineral (e.g., lead, mercury, copper, calcium) is bonded to another substance. It is a natural, indeed, a vital process that goes on continually in our bodies. Chelation therapy employing the weak acid, EDTA, has been shown for decades to safely improve blood flow and relieve symptoms associated with atherosclerotic vascular disease in more than 80% of patients so treated.

[Karl: EDTA does NOT, itself, increase blood flow. EDTA removes toxic metals. Removal of toxic metals reduces free radical activity. Reduced free radical activity allows individual cells to be revitalized. It is the revitalization of the cell which, then, causes the blood flow to increase.

There is an apparency of truth in Dr. Dean's opening statement, but it hides the truth of the actual chain of events.

Although the mechanisms involved in chelation are extremely complex, chelation therapy can be understood simply as the removal of calcium and other minerals that promote blood clotting and promotes atherosclerosis. Since these metallic catalysts also cause excessive oxygen free-radical proliferation, EDTA chelation also helps reduce pathological lipid peroxidation of cell membranes, DNA, enzyme systems, and lipoproteins. This allows the body's natural healing mechanisms to halt and often reverse the disease process.

[Karl: Dean still doesn't get it. He may hide behind some grammar concept, but EDTA does NOT remove calcium -- except very indirectly.

EDTA, whether taken orally or intravenously, is attracted to HEAVY metals -- it would "remove" calcium only if there were zero quantity of other elements that had heavier atomic weights than calcium. In any event my own formula places a full load of calcium into the EDTA mixture so that it cannot possibly remove ANY calcium. It is already holding as much calcium as it can hold. It actually lets go of calcium in order to grab onto something heavier.

Of course, ultimately, there is calcium removed from inside cells, but the mechanism is simple and well understood. The EDTA does not do this directly. To repeat, the EDTA removes HEAVY metals (not calcium) and that results in fewer free radicals and THAT results in revitalized cells and THAT results in cells getting rid of waste products more easily, including calcium.

EDTA (ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid) is a common man-made amino acid. You cannot get it from foods. It is used by the carload as a food additive and has been used for decades to prevent banked or drawn blood from clotting. EDTA is relatively nontoxic and risk free, especially when compared with other conventional medical treatments for protection from heart disease (like coronary artery bypass surgery or coronary angioplasty). When administered by a properly trained physician, IV EDTA has an extremely low risk of side effects- less than 1/10,000 patients. Oral EDTA, which does not require a physician's intervention, is probably even safer.

Oral EDTA has been used since the 1940s for removing lead from the body. Observant doctors who treated people with high blood lead levels noted that their symptoms of occlusive vascular disease were also disappearing. Although oral EDTA was clearly effective, it was supplanted during the 1960s as the standard of treatment by intravenous chelation for reasons that have more to do with politics than medicine.

[Karl: While Dean is right about the "political reasons" for the disappearance of oral chelation, he should know better than to ignore them. They are fully covered in my materials.

Despite its well-documented safety and efficacy, EDTA chelation therapy has been the subject of a vociferous campaign of smear and suppression by the governmental/medical/pharmaceutical complex. Nevertheless, it has survived and prospered thanks to a relatively few courageous physicians, many of whom are members of the American College of Advancement in Medicine (ACAM). To date these physicians have treated close to a million patients with occlusive vascular disease with a success rate that conventional medicine can only dream of.

[Karl: I agree with this too. I knew one I/V doctor very well. He stayed out of trouble even though he had a large chelation practice. He was "on staff" at two of the three hospitals in his city and never had any trouble. I knew another doctor who was driven from the chelation business. When I compare the two the troubles the one had were far more related to HIS personality than to outside forces! Some doctors get very combative about their rights to use some treatment. Others just "do it!"

The "Father" of the modern chelation movement, and one of the cofounders of ACAM, is Garry F. Gordon, MD, DO. A world-renowned expert on chelation therapy, nutrition, mineral metabolism, and alternative and preventive therapies, Dr. Gordon wrote the original protocol for the safe and effective use of EDTA. He has published many scientific papers and is co-author of the best-selling book, The Chelation Answer. In this exclusive interview, Dr. Gordon describes the state of the art in oral and IV chelation therapy, and he explains why nearly everyone can benefit from this remarkable but, sadly, underused therapy.

[Karl: Well, again, the full truth is not quite like this. The "other" author of this book is "Dr." Morton Walker. He has "written" many books, with many "co-authors" and those other "authors" should be ashamed to allow Walker to put his name on "their" volumes. This Book has nothing really bad in it, but it is a hack job by a paid writer. "Dr." Walker's title is not related to medicine!

Dr. Gordon: EDTA is closely related to vinegar, ordinary acetic acid! It's actually a weak acid. If you put an eggshell in vinegar, it'll dissolve. In the same way, EDTA will take calcium off your arteries. But, amazingly enough, it washes part of the calcium down, out through the kidneys. At the same time, through a complex action of the parathyroid gland, EDTA actually stimulates bone growth. Thus, even though it's removing calcium from plaque in blood vessels, it has the ability to make bones stronger.

[Karl: Shame on you Garry! Yes, what you say is true. If you put an egg shell into water with vinegar it will dissolve. But, notice that this water does NOT contain any other minerals, to amount to much, beyond calcium. In the absence of any heavier element, vinegar (or EDTA) will get rid of calcium.

The calcium in your body is nothing like the calcium of an egg shell in a glass of vinegar!

LE: EDTA also reduces blood clotting that can lead to heart attacks and strokes. Is it any different from aspirin in this regard?

Dr. Gordon: There was recently a 31-page supplement published in the Lancet (November, 1996), in which it is pointed out that common anticlotting therapies like aspirin and coumadin are effective against only about one-third of excessive platelet aggregation and coag-ulation. None of them gets at the whole problem. EDTA, on the other hand, appears to have effects against all clotting mechanisms.

LE: Isn't such a powerful anticlotting therapy dangerous? Couldn't you actually cause a blood clot to break loose?

Dr. Gordon: No, we have never lost anybody from a blood clot breaking loose. Yet, we don't have anybody who takes EDTA on a regular basis bleed to death when they have an auto accident or cut themselves shaving, either. So I've got the best of all worlds. I don't have to bring you in for blood tests every week; and I don't have to keep your blood so thin that it's dangerous, like physicians who prescribe coumadin do. And, yet, even if you get angry or eat a heavy meal, have too much sugar, or if you're diabetic whatever other blood-thickening risk factors you've got, you virtually can't get a clot if you're protected with a total oral-chelation formula. The amazing thing is my patients just about don't die!

LE: Do you have to worry about removing other, more beneficial, metals as well?

Dr. Gordon: We know that EDTA is a nonspecific chelator, and we know that everyone who takes EDTA will have less lead in their blood and, presumably, in their body. But, zinc also comes out very fast in the urine, so when you take EDTA, you can induce zinc deficiency easily. I suggest taking it with an aggressive multiple vitamin mineral supplement, emphasizing zinc. A pregnant woman has to be especially careful, because if she becomes zinc deficient, her fetus may develop abnormally.

[Karl: What does Dr. Gordon mean by "nonspecific?" If he means that EDTA will remove any heavy metal, without regard to its atomic weight, he knows that isn't true because he and I have discussed just this issue at length.

Gordon is right, of course, that people who get EDTA have less lead in their bodies. That does not mean that the EDTA is a nonspecific chelator, unless Garry has some very special definition for "nonspecific."

Dr. Gordon: Garlic is already becoming the darling of the country. Even Jane Brodie of The New York Times, who has always attacked all the health claims made by the nutritional supplement industry, has published articles lauding what garlic can do. Garlic will chelate lead and mercury, absolutely, without question. We have all sorts of research on this. Even red dye #40 will be chelated out by garlic. An animal that will turn red on red dye #40 won't do that on garlic.

This really works; in fact, in aggressive quantities, you could lower anybody's familial hypercholesterolemia. We had one patient at Stanford University who could never get her cholesterol below 500. Once she started taking 6 tablespoons a day of the EDTA-based chelation formula, we were able to bring her down to 200. So we can do miracles with the stuff.

[Karl: I don't disagree with this, but consider that one of the main components of garlic is sulfur. And consider that my oral chelation formula is based largely on the sulfur amino acid -- cysteine (and N Acetyl Cysteine). Garlic happens to be a very good source of sulfur and that may be its primary value in the diet. There is nothing wrong with using lots of garlic. I've added lots of garlic to my oral chelation just for this reason -- but let's also recognize that the underlying, biochemical reason is probably just sulfur. By the way, don't over look the use of organic sulfur in a very inexpensive form.

LE: Let's talk about how chelation actually helps reduce heart disease. What exactly is going on?

Dr. Gordon: When we use the word chelation today, most doctors are going to assume you are talking about intravenous chelation.

[Karl: It appears that it is ME who is changing that. Many people now think of "chelation" in its true meaning, rather than rigidly tied to just one form of chelation therapy.

Basically IV and oral do many of the same things. There are more than 30 distinct mechanisms that may contribute to the beneficial effects. These include increasing the cyclic AMP to cyclic GMP ratio, affecting the level of calcium in the platelet membranes, and the level of calcium in red blood cells, and many others. All blood cells die. Your red blood cells die after about 120 days. All older mammalian cells accumulate increased intracellular calcium that leads to decreased physiological and biochemical performance. Because EDTA ties up calcium so avidly, it was used by blood banks for 15 years to prevent blood from clotting. Once you tie up calcium, blood can't clot.

Dr. Gordon: There are 7,000 known articles in our possession about EDTA, and I am sure if I hired somebody and we really went to work, there would be another 3,000 that we haven't found. So there would be about 10,000 articles on EDTA. Today there is a group that has proposed that one of the biggest actions of EDTA could be its ability to tie up transition metals, such as copper and iron, which are known to catalyze free-radical activity by a factor of up to several thousandfold. When you use EDTA right now for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction, you are trying to prevent what we call reperfusion injury, the damage that occurs when blood flow returns to an area from which it has been blocked. That's very exciting stuff, and it is really deep when you get into advances in free-radical pathology.

I have stayed with a fairly simple concept, which is not embraced by my entire academy (the American College of Advancement in Medicine, ACAM, which now has over a thousand physician members). There is greater and greater interest today, since we have ultra high-speed CAT scans that can now find calcification in your coronary arteries so tiny that they won't show up in an x-ray. When I first got into the field 27 years ago and asserted that calcium was a part of the atherosclerotic process, it was believed by my opponents that calcium was a late and unimportant part of the process.

Calcium is now being accepted as an excellent marker, and not a late marker at all. There are a lot of reasons to pay attention to it, and with IV EDTA chelation therapy, you can show that the calcium deposited in a human's aorta (or any other part of a human that pathologically calcifies) will go back into solution with repeated treatments.

[Karl: Remember the fascinating data that a CAT scan cannot tell the difference between a speck of calcium INSIDE a cell and that same speck OUTSIDE the cell.

In other words, if the calcium appears to be OUTSIDE the cell, then you could call it plaque -- something which adheres to the outside of a cell.

If the calcium is actually INSIDE the cell, then it should not be called plaque, but what it is -- solidified garbage that the cell was too weak to expel.

There may not be much difference in the result of this unwanted calcium, but there sure is some difference in how you would remove it!

Since EDTA couldn't possibly remove calcium directly, being more attracted to heavy metals, and being already bound up with calcium when it is administered, these doctors had better give up trying to claim that some "calcium plaque" is being removed by EDTA.

Dr. Gordon: This is not likely with IV treatment if you go to an ACAM-trained physician who follows our protocol, and it is impossible with oral EDTA. The body can't have the ionic blood calcium level get too low or your heart would stop beating. However, when you lower it with EDTA, which ties up all the available calcium, the body immediately turns up the production of parathormone from the parathyroid gland, which then allows you to steal any calcium back into the blood to keep your heart beating.

Amazingly enough, parathormone, activates two types of bone cells, osteoclasts that break down bone and release the calcium, and then bone-building cells called osteoblasts, that cause the bone to get stronger.

So the more chelation we give people, the less osteoporosis they have and the less age-related calcium accumulation there is in their blood vessels. In other words, the average 80-year-old man, if you take the aorta out of his dead body, shows 140 times more calcium than he had at age 10. The mesenteric artery shows about a 50-fold increase, and the coronary arteries show a 30-fold increase. This means you're gradually turning to stone in all your arteries. We can document that calcium accumulation in the artery is totally reversible by enough chelation.

[Karl: Another nice piece of truth -- even if the location of that calcium is not disclosed!

LE: There seems to be considerable controversy about whether oral chelation agents are as effective as IV.

Dr. Gordon: That was the position that I originally took. There was a high-level meeting of the AMA Special Division of Occupational Medicine in 1966 or 1967. They came out with a statement saying it was virtually malpractice for doctors to prescribe oral EDTA. The reason they did it was basically because doctors paid by the lead industry had some guidelines put together by the Occupational and Health Boards of the US government stating that you could keep people on the job even if their blood lead level was as high as 60 or 80 µg/dL.

Now we know blood lead is unsafe at a level as low as 10 µg/dL. But, in those days they used to let people continue working while their blood lead was 80, 90, even 100. When they got above that they had to take them off the job, which was expensive and looked bad. So the doctors would cheat and give the guys calcium EDTA tablets. That way the lead industry was able to postpone ventilating and cleaning up their factories, and it saved the lead industry millions of dollars.

The AMA strongly objected to this practice . . . justifiably. But then they went too far, because they said that if any doctor uses these tablets, we're going to come down on him. So all EDTA treatments went into disrepute, and they were threatening my entire organization's (ACAM's predecessor, the American Academy of Medical Preventics [AAMP]) existence. They were trying to lock doctors up and throw away the key just for using EDTA, even though the package insert, by Abbott Laboratory, had claimed for more than 15 years that EDTA was "possibly effective in vascular occlusive disease."

The AMA had a real hang-up about oral EDTA. So in order to get them off our back, I agreed to publicly damn it, although, at the time I was not as familiar as I now am with the abundance of evidence that oral EDTA was so beneficial.

[Karl: This is the first time I have ever heard that Dr. Gordon takes responsibility for the suppression of the value of oral EDTA -- it is only right that he should then lead the fight to restore it to its rightful position for oral use.

In fact, it was only after I wrote The Chelation Answer and damned the oral use of EDTA so heavily

[Karl: Remember that Morton Walker actually "wrote" this book, based not on his own research, but on what Dr. Gordon should have known was not true -- the false claim that oral EDTA was harmful!

that I became aware that a soap manufacturer in Milwaukee had bought it by the barrel and was giving it away free of charge to people and telling them to go home and mix it with grapefruit juice. Over the years we have accumulated data from some of those people who had black feet from early gangrene. Some of them actually had been seen by a doctor and had medical records to prove it. It was clear from these records that this stuff did some miraculous things to some of those people, although we don't know the percentages. We only know a few of the success stories, and there may be a lot of them. I don't know its overall rate of success.

I use IV treatment to get people's arteries younger, and to increase blood flow in their arteries. We can prove this with any measurement that would be meaningful from a PO2 on their finger (the partial pressure of oxygen) to a plethysmograph, or a Doppler reading, or a thermograph, or how long you can stay on a treadmill before you get claudication, or how long you stay on a treadmill before your ECG turns bad, or what your ejection fraction is on your heart. Anything you can measure, our doctors have done.

Because we have now treated over a million patients, we know that intravenous EDTA does some miraculous things. What percentage of those things are also possible with oral EDTA I do not know. Thus, I would rather take the position that the two treatments do entirely different things. Because we know that oral EDTA is poorly absorbed (3-8% is the figure that is usually used) we take the position that that amount of oral material would never be enough to significantly change ionizable calcium levels the way it does when we use 3 gm intravenously, which is 100% absorbed.

[Karl: Garry is being politically correct here -- although he has told me that oral EDTA is effective in the gut. Let's see if he says that during this interview.

To roughly calculate the dose and the relative benefit of oral chelation, let's do some math. For example, I've been getting success by giving people 800 mg of EDTA by mouth each day for many, many years. This works out to a total daily dose of about 40 mg a day. If we assume that we're getting about 5% absorption, at the end of a month, we will have absorbed about 1200 mg.

On that theoretical number basis, you could state that it would take 2 months to get the same effects from 4 hours sitting in a doctor's office getting a 3 gm IV. Many of the IV treatments we've now used successfully use about 1500 mg, which would mean that essentially oral EDTA gives them about the same dose at the end of, say, 5 weeks. So, you might say that every 5 weeks they could get the same benefits that they got in taking one treatment in the doctor's office.

[Karl: Well, he hasn't admitted it yet. The above is the source of some serious falsehood on the web -- that oral chelation is no good because only EDTA could be considered as a chelating substance, and only 5% gets absorbed, and only that which is absorbed does any good.

I know that Garry doesn't agree with this, but Dr. Dean apparently didn't demand answers on these lines.

LE: You're now an advocate of oral EDTA for chelation, but that wasn't always the case. Why did you change?

[Karl: Incidentally, I was in the same dump with him. I was calling oral EDTA a fraud -- and it was exactly and only Dr. Gordon who corrected me on this. I spent a couple days at his home in early 1999. We discussed these concepts thoroughly and I took his advice when I changed my oral chelation formula to include EDTA.

Dr. Gordon: Back in the 1960s, when the lead industry was abusing EDTA, the medical people put a gun to my head, and said, "If you say anything good about oral EDTA, we will, essentially, take you out and shoot you!" So, I was forced to damn oral EDTA and say the only way to go was intravenous.

[Karl: I have never bowed to any threat of this type -- check my record. For instance, see what I did when the IRS wanted me in jail!

Now, I am able to honestly say that oral EDTA does many beneficial things, but I'll never say that it does the same as IV chelation therapy. IV chelation makes you physiologically younger, because it moves calcium off of your arteries and makes your bones stronger. Oral chelation therapy merely prevents clots from forming so you don't have to die of a heart attack or stroke.

[Karl: Well, Garry, you blew it! You certainly weren't saying this in April 1999!

Occasionally, oral chelation does other things. I've known people who had such poor peripheral circulation that their feet were black bordering on gangrene. After oral chelation, their black feet became pink again. I've known other people bordering on dementia whose long-lost memories come back again. But, I don't talk about that too much, because I don't want to hurt and alienate people who've invested so much in IV chelation. And I don't want those people who are symptomatic of serious disease to put off life-saving IV treatments or to think that oral EDTA is just as good as IV. It's not!

[Karl: Garry! How do those black feet turn pink? It is not caused by the absence of blood clotting problems!

For years it has been the internal lack of logic that has tripped up the chelation doctors. They have made claims that were known to be foolish and false -- claims like "EDTA chips away, like a rooter-rooter, and removes calcium plague on the inside of the arteries." That is not the way it works, and most of the chelation doctors know that. They are stuck, unfortunately, with their false stories of the past, unable to now reveal the truth -- that their miracle treatment is a miracle for some reason different from what they had claimed.

Now EDTA alone isn't doing all of this. EDTA needs to be synergistically combined with certain nutrients. So when we give patients this combination, I can prove by platelet testing that these people will not develop excessive or dangerous clots, their platelets won't get sticky, and arteriosclerosis will slow down.

[Karl: "Synergistically combined?" What does that mean? You take a bunch of ingredients, pour them into a vat, stir, and put them in a capsule. That is not mysterious. My formula has about 51 ingredients. Dr. Gordon's formula has many of the same, but several different. It does not take mystery to figure out what to put in there -- you just read standardly available scientific studies on substances that help the heart.

Dr. Gordon: Today in medicine we are allowed to use the term "outcome analysis." Let's compare a group of my patients with any level of stageable disease and simply see which of my patients are alive at the end of 5 years versus any other standard therapy. I couldn't believe it when I went to the meetings with the big cardiologists and found that they consider the diagnosis of congestive heart failure to be virtually a death sentence, because over 60% of their patients are dead within the first year. I haven't lost one patient with congestive failure in 10 years! It shocks me how big a difference there is, depending on which school of medicine you follow.

[Karl: I sure agree with Garry here! People die because of ignorance and malpractice! The world needs to know the story of chelation -- both I/V and oral!

Dr. Gordon: They dismiss these findings by saying, "It's just anecdotal." Until we give one group a placebo and the other one the active substance, and neither one knows which is getting which, nothing that we say will be accepted by anybody.

Last year we got a $2.5 million grant from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, with full approval of the FDA, to do a study in a university medical school setting. It was to be under the chief researcher, Stephen F. Olmstead, MD, who is a cardiology professor at the University of Washington School of Medicine. Well, since he agreed to do this study, his life has been wrecked, because he has gone from being a legitimate, world class, widely recognized researcher to being the butt of dirty jokes from all the "orthodox" medical doctors in the state. He has been ostracized, solely because he was willing to study chelation. And despite the fact that he had a $2.5 million grant from the NHLBI, an official arm of National Institutes of Health, the dean of the medical school killed the study just hours before it was scheduled to begin, for reasons that only he knows.

We've never heard of a university turning down $2.5 million before. Off the top of it, the university is typically allowed to pocket 40% of that money for "administrative" expenses. For them to turn down 40% of $2.5 million, the dean must have been promised something pretty juicy by somebody who couldn't have the truth about EDTA come out.

Until we do such a study, anything we say is laughed at, is not publishable, continues to be called "anecdotal," and is unimportant to anybody except the million satisfied patients who have been successfully treated.

Dr. Gordon: Everybody in the country is being told by their doctors to take aspirin to prevent blood clotting. They're all doing it. But it's not hard to get the figures (because they are well-published) that there are 3,000 deaths a year from aspirin poisoning. There's no human being that can swallow an aspirin who will not have a corrosive effect on the membrane of their stomach and cause a microhemorrhage right where the pill hits the stomach. That's a simple fact. Nobody can really refute it. By contrast, in a proper combination with other natural anticlotting substances, oral EDTA is a safe and effective alternative. It's the best blood thinner that anybody could take. Doctors also like to prescribe a dangerous poison called coumadin for thinning the blood. Coumadin is the same thing you can buy at the hardware store to get rid of mice and rats. Many people are also putting their belief in vitamin E as a blood thinner.

[Karl: Well, maybe I need to ask Garry about this "blood thinning" business. I thought that what we were after is making blood particles more slippery -- a more accurate term than "thinner."

When blood particles (cells, etc.) clump up together they form something like clots -- it is often referred to as "platelet aggregation." If the particles are slippery they don't clump up. I don't know the mechanism by which EDTA (and cysteine, etc.) reduce the problem of "platelet aggregation" but I would not refer to that process as making the blood "thinner!"

I suspect that aspirin makes blood "thin" in a way different from the way EDTA or cysteine reduces platelet aggregation.

Now, all of these have some antiplatelet, or anticlotting, or anticoagulation effects. But, if we look at the bleeding and clotting cascade, it's a very complicated subject. That review in The Lancet points out that aspirin or coumadin or even vitamin E combined fail to hit more than one-third of the known factors involved in clotting. Obviously, if you could find something that would cover the other two-thirds, you would have a marked reduction in death rate.

We happen to have that stuff, but I have not got the budget to do the research (at least $250 million) to be able to say how much of this benefit that I have seen in my own patients of decreased death rate is achievable from oral EDTA alone.

Dr. Gordon: Garlic has been listed in the New England Journal of Medicine and The Lancet as a proven antiplatelet, anticlotting factor. And as you keep looking into it, you find that vitamin E, and carrageenin, as well as the essential fatty acids, including "maxEPA" and oil of primrose, all have these activities.

The essential fatty acids are proven now by millions of dollars of research to be what we call calcium ionophores. This is a big word, but it basically means that they both reduce the ability of your body to lose calcium from bone and help to slow its transfer to tissue, which is what I am telling you IV EDTA does. That's why I am telling you that IV EDTA is an antiaging treatment, because all aging mammalian tissues, with the exception of bone, become increasingly calcified.

Dr. Gordon: Yes, amazingly enough, it obviously is going to put the stone back into solution, depending on the amount of calcium in the stone. There's a whole research society in Germany that's specialized in the use of EDTA. They get the tough cases where the stone inside the kidneys is almost the size of your thumb (they call it a staghorn calculus). They would put the EDTA in the backward way, through the penis, up through the bladder, up through the tube and then let you lay in bed and drip the EDTA, just like you could dissolve a stalactite or a stalagmite.

I use EDTA with people with small stones, and I tell them that they are very likely to drop that small stone and pass it. Remember that all the EDTA you put into your body leaves in your urine virtually unchanged. When it goes out unchanged it still hasn't lost its affinity, which is called its chelating ability or metal-binding power. It always has to attract to itself a "date," and that "date" is a metal, and that metal will be weakly attractive to magnesium, slightly stronger to calcium, slightly stronger to copper, quite a bit stronger to zinc, quite a bit stronger to lead, and extremely tightly tied to chromium.

[Karl: Well! Garry is admitting the truth -- that EDTA has an attraction to metals based on their atomic weight. So, if any of those other metals are in the body, why would he say that EDTA would go after calcium?

If you put the EDTA into an area where there is only calcium, I guess it would take that calcium out.

LE: So, what you are saying is, it may cause part of a stone to break off and you could have a kidney stone attack from that?

Dr. Gordon: Definitely, and that is a standard part of the warning, that is included. Obviously, when I learned all these things, I had to put this into a protocol. Most people are happy to pass the stone if they understand that it is going to happen. So, I never withhold EDTA, because in everything you do in medicine, you have to look at the benefit-to-risk ratio. Although it may be uncomfortable to pass a stone, if you know that in the long run it's always sitting there with the potential that it could drop down into a tube and cause a kidney to completely obstruct, it's obviously in your best interest to get rid of it. If chelation gets rid of it without surgery, without fracturing it, without having to do any of the ultrasonic treatment, this is not such a bad deal.

Our experience on kidney stones has been entirely with the IV chelation. With the oral route, if you're only getting 800 mg, the stone will probably dissolve much more slowly, which may make passing it even easier.

Remember also that you should never go a day without taking extra vitamin B6 and magnesium, since most calcific stones are entirely stopped you don't form any more for the rest of your life if you take additional magnesium, about 400 mg elemental magnesium per day, plus at least a couple of hundred milligrams of vitamin B6 per day. That's pretty clear in the literature.

LE: Who should be taking EDTA? Should you wait until you have symptoms of heart disease or should you start when you are 30 years old?

Dr. Gordon: It is on front pages everywhere that lead poisoning is rampant in America. There are studies widely available showing, without question, that the lower the level of lead, the higher the IQ, performance, and coordination of the child. Yet, as recently as 2 years ago, the enamel on certain bathtubs was still lead-based. So when you put your baby in it, you were bathing your baby in lead. We know it is too expensive to tear up all the lead-containing pipes in Boston and many other cities, and everybody is supposed to run their water before they drink it.

EDTA is an effective treatment for lead poisoning, so when you ask, who should have it, you have to consider that chelating out lead for everybody has a tremendous benefit. If I lived in Boston and my kid was 3 years old, if he could swallow the pill, I'd have him taking the pills. And of course by doing that, he'd have this wonderful side effect. He'd have less vascular disease over a lifetime, a clear-cut benefit. When it got to the point that his doctor started saying, "Well, gee, everybody in your family has died of heart attacks, you should start on aspirin," he could say, "Yes, doc, but I've got a safer alternative."

LE: I'm surprised that the pharmaceutical companies are not trying to come up with an analog of EDTA, an EDTA-type drug, the way they do with other natural substances.

Dr. Gordon: It would make sense. We have interested some high level people. There are ways the patents could be done, but chelation has become such a dirty word today. If they were really interested, once the drug companies saw that this stuff really works, then obviously they could go into liposome methods of delivery, or work with EDTA, or come up with a new molecule.

[Karl: It's good to know that the drug companies might make an expensive product to replace the cheap one. It kinda makes you happy to be here!

In fact, we have a high-level chelation research society comprised of scientists from as far away as Moscow and Beijing. These people can devise new chelators every 5 minutes with their computers to do a specific chelation of, for example, plutonium in a pH range of 3 or a pH range of 8, in the presence of zinc or not. I mean, this is a highly refined science.

LE: So, with a given patient, when would you do IV chelation and when would you do oral chelation?

Dr. Gordon: Basically, my position is this: the oral is an insurance policy to guarantee that you stay alive long enough to take the IV when and if you choose to do so. I tell everybody that the IV produces a "youthifying" effect to deal with several basic aspects of aging, including the calcification of your blood vessels. The total oral formulation is the only way I know to keep people alive who don't want to die of a heart attack, stroke, cardiac spasm, arrhythmia, or blood clot.

People who are symptomatic really have no choice. Once they have any symptoms of heart disease, or fail a treadmill test, or have silent ischemia picked up on a Holter monitor, or whatever method happens to bring them to our attention, anybody who is in trouble, I tell them they have to take IV and stay on the oral, because taking the oral too means the beneficial effect of the IV will not be lost rapidly.

[Karl: I don't disagree with this. I/V is faster, but without having an intravenous drip of additional vitamins in the I/V treatment, I believe oral is better.

I, myself, have had about 20 I/V treatments and I always urge people to get them AND oral, at the same time. There is no reason you cannot do both, unless you believe your doctor when he tells you that you should not!

In other words, if I take a 90-year-old guy- that's a man with a 90-year-old body- I give him 30 IV chelations, and he now tells me how smart I am and how wonderful he feels, it's still a 90-year-old body. If he doesn't stay on the oral chelation, he's going to need to be on an IV treatment every 2 weeks if he's diabetic or has severe cholesterol disturbance, and every 4 weeks if he doesn't have that. So often, I do only one IV treatment a month on people even if they have high-risk factors, if they stay on the oral EDTA formula, too. The point is, I can lower risk factors and get along on far fewer IV therapies when I have the oral also going in. I have taken on patients who were inoperable, who had already had every known form of bypass surgery, until there weren't any more veins in their legs to strip out to put in their heart. They were sent home to die, and I could get those people back to full functioning. I've had doctor friends who wouldn't take the IV at first, but who now are on oral EDTA, and are able to pass a treadmill stress test that they couldn't pass for 5 years. I've had lots of good things happen with oral EDTA-based supplement programs.

We can count the number of crow's feet next to a woman's eyes and show that those crow's feet disappear with intravenous chelation therapy. So, we know that we are reversing cross-linkages. EDTA-based oral chelation provides automatic protection against the clotting process, as well as lowering their level of lead, so that they will have a higher functioning immune system, better IQ, better coordination, and so on.

It is also my firm belief that anyone considering using aspirin for the prevention of heart attack should learn everything they can about oral EDTA. It is my belief that EDTA is as much as 300 times safer than aspirin, since we have never had anybody bleed to death, or die with oral EDTA.

At the same time, when oral EDTA is used with other natural anticlotting substances (e.g., garlic, primrose oil, maxEPA, and carrageenin), there will be synergy.

Ward Dean, M.D.

Dr. Ward Dean graduated from the U.S. Military Academy, West Point, New York. He served as an infantry officer for six years, during which time he was an instructor at the U.S. Army Ranger School and combat advisor to the Vietnamese Rangers. He received his M.D. degree from Han Yang University, Seoul, Korea. During seven more years of service, Dr. Dean participated in a number of classified missions as Flight Surgeon for the Delta Force, America’s top-secret counter-terrorist unit.

Center for BioGerontology

Dr. Dean is now the Medical Director of the Center for BioGerontology in Pensacola, Florida. He has published more than 70 articles and reviews in professional journals, and is the author of Biological Aging Measurement—Clinical Applications [1988], co-author of The Neuroendocrine Theory of Aging and Degenerative Disease (with the late Professor Vladimir Dilman) [1992], and co-author of Smart Drugs & Nutrients [1990], Smart Drugs II: The Next Generation [1993], and GHB: The Natural Mood Enhancer [1998].

Dr. Dean’s Health Care Plan

Vitamin Research Products

If you missed it, you can go to either a SHORT explanation of the whole story, or a detailed explanation on ONE PAGE. On this page you are getting more detail on one part of the story, but on either of those pages you can get the broad picture. Don't miss reading one of them. You can actually spend many hours on this web site, depending on the depth of research and reading you want to do. There are an amazing 4,000 pages here -- more information on these general subjects than almost all other web sites combined! At some point along the way you will probably say, "Karl's crazy," and leave never to return to this site, or you will say "I want to try some of that oral chelation formula he writes about!"

Special Pages On The Various of 12 Web Sites Authored by Karl Loren
OC History	Oral Chelation		Testimonials
Family Of Three Oral Chelation Formulas	Life Glow Basic		Life Glow Basic Ingredient List
Life Glow Plus	Life Glow Plus Ingredient List		American Heart Association -- Lies
Super Life Glow	Super Life Glow Ingredient List		FAQ
All Products	Shopping Cart Order Section		Research
Taheebo Life Tea	Witch Doctors Versus Harvard		MSM Sulfur
Calcium	How Bones Grow		Colloidal Minerals
Jean Ross	Philosophy		The Wednesday Letter
Arthritis & James Coburn's Use Of MSM	Karl Loren Viewpoints		News And Announcements
Dr. Flanagan's Microhydrin	500 Page Book On Heart Disease		Colostrum & Transfer Factor
Germanium	Ultrasound Technology		Bulk MSM
Cancer & Biopsy	Diabetes		Heart Disease & Bypass Surgery
Karl Loren's Diet	Guarantee		Navigation Help Page
The Links Below Jump To Pages On Whatever Web You Are In
Table Of Contents	Search This Web		Navigation Help Page
Write To Karl Loren -- He Pledges To Answer EVERY Personal Message, Personally. Click here or on his name in the box below.
The Links Below Are To Various Web Sites Published By Karl Loren
Karl Loren Web	Vibrant Life Web		Karl Loren's Book
Super Colostrum	Bulk MSM		Heart Disease
Emmessar	Happiness		Arthritis
Instead Of	Chelation Therapy		Super Colostrum (2)
Karl Loren's Catalog Store		Central Page For All 12 Webs!

SUBSCRIBE: The Wednesday Letter is a free electronic monthly newsletter written and published by Karl Loren. You can view more than 50 back issues of this publication by clicking here. The Wednesday Letter subscription list is maintained on a secure server, no name is ever given or sold to anyone, and it is never used except for this Newsletter. It is automatically published on the Tuesday night just before the first Wednesday of every month. You can subscribe to this free monthly electronic letter by entering your eMail address and name below. You will then automatically receive a request for confirmation, sent to whatever address you have entered. If you do NOT receive this confirmation request, then you will not be subscribed. There may have been an error with your address and you should resubmit. The letter is never sent twice to the same address -- so you do not have to worry about a duplicate subscription. When you receive this confirmation request you must reply to it, or your subscription will not become active. No one can subscribe your name, and address, without you being notified, and if you get an unwanted notice of subscription you only need to DO NOTHING and the subscription will NOT be active.

REMOVAL: You can remove yourself from the subscription list in several different ways. Click here to read about this entire newsletter system. Every edition of The Wednesday Letter is delivered to your address with YOUR name and address in view on the letter, with a link that allows you to remove THAT name from the subscription list. If you try to send this removal message from an address different from the one you used to send in your original confirmation, then you will get a warning notice first, sent to the subscription address, asking you to confirm that you want to be removed from the list -- by replying to THAT request for confirmation, you will then be automatically removed. Thus, no one else can unsubscribe you, from some other computer, without your knowledge. But, if you send in the unsubscribe notice from the same machine used to receive the Letter, then the removal from the subscription list is automatic.

Personal Message: When you send a personal message to Karl Loren, you will receive a personal reply as per his instructions. Karl pledges that every personal message will get a personal answer. When you provide your mail address, we will send you free information including our free catalog and a cassette tape lecture by Karl Loren about heart disease, no charge, by mail, even if outside the US. You can select particular information you would like to receive, along with the free cassette tape and catalog.

You can reach Vibrant Life in many ways, including by mail to Vibrant Life, 2808 N. Naomi St., Burbank, CA 91504. Within the US and Canada, use the toll free number: (800) 523-4521, the local number: (818) 558-1799, the FAX: (818) 558-7299, eMail to kimberly@oralchelation.com or any one of the hundreds of message forms throughout the 50 web sites. Vibrant Life normally ships the same day we get an order. There are message forms on each of the 100,000+ pages on this and other sites where you can communicate with Vibrant Life. Check out our companion site, at: http://www.oralchelation.net where Karl's 2000 page book is published. Karl Loren is the author and webmaster for this BOOK, as well as for another web site about ORAL CHELATION. His personal philosophical articles are at PHILOSOPHY.

Copyright © May 20, 2008 6:25 AM by Karl Loren on behalf of Vibrant Life, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Permission is granted for non-commercial downloading, copying, distribution or redistribution on two conditions: One, that some form of copyright notice is included in every copy distributed or copied, showing the copyright belonging to Vibrant Life, Burbank, CA, at www.oralchelation.com . The second condition is that the material is not to be used for any purpose contrary to the purposes and objectives of this site. This permission does not extend to materials on this site which are copyrighted by others.